🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial move to ban social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and parents are watching intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

European Trend

In Europe, a rising number of nations are moving toward similar bans.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our children's innocence". A law could be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an similar ban is "an options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked lawmakers to approve a law increasing the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged parents to restrict their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has approved a advisory statement supporting a ban for minors except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the resolution does not create binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a solid starting point," commented the MEP driving the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a possible ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any decision must be "based on robust research".

Earlier, support grew behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the government committed to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. One foundation established by the family of a young person who took her own life after encountering disturbing platform posts contends that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for children," commented a influential child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, action is mostly happening at the local level due to federal inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a law limiting minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with additional access needing parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced laws requiring guardian approval for minors to open social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from various politicians to copy Australia's path, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Views

Outside of the West, other countries are also considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, international organizations take a more nuanced stance. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The body points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

As this worldwide conversation continues, the actions of the Australian government and its followers show that governments internationally are less and less content to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.